HYDOLL Sex Dolls

having sex with a doll Relevant Information

(Popularity Rate: 69 ) Is a woman in her 30's too old to play with dolls when she wants a real child but unable to give birth so she plays with dolls and her husband finds this weird that she plays with dolls at her age?

It is a little odd, kind of like sucking your thumb as an adult. At this point in our lives we should have learned to self-soothe. There is not a lack of children needing care, however. Even if her husband is not interested in doing foster care or adoption, many people desperately need a babysitter even if it’s just here and there. I would imagine interacting with a real child would meet her needs better than role playing with dolls. And she would be making having sex with a doll a huge difference in a child’s life.

(Popularity Rate: 83 ) What are some examples of realistic depictions of romantic relationships in TV and film?

love. Features good work across the board from Demi Moore, Rob Lowe, Elizabeth Perkins, and Jim Belushi. Based upon David Mamet's 1974 play Sexual Perversity in Chicago.
Murphy's Romance (1986)--Sally Field and James Garner slowly create a very authentic-feeling adult romance out of a tho

(Popularity Rate: 11 ) Is it weird, as a female, that I want to buy a strap-on dildo to have sex with a female/shemale sex doll?

ng is, it doesn’t matter if it’s weird. There’s tremendous fear around being “weird” when it comes to sex. That fear causes a lot of unnecessary suffering. Yes, it’s unusual, but so what? It’s a lot less weird than some of

(Popularity Rate: 91 ) Is it a sin in Islam to have sex with a sex doll?

leased concerning this exact question. I will post the entire answer for you here on Quora. tl;dr It is haram (sinful) to have sex with a sex doll. Fatwa No : 85010 Sex dolls Fatwa Date : Sha'baan 8, 1423 / 14-10-2002 “Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the World; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all his Family and Companions. Allah, the Exalted, Says: {And those who guard their chastity (i.e. private parts, from illegal sexual acts) Except from their wives or (the captives and slaves) that their right hands possess, for then, they are free from blame; But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors;} [23: 5-7]. Imam al-Shanqiti (may Allah's Mercy be upon him), while commenting on the above verse in his book Adwaa al-Bayaan, said: 'Allah has stated that those who guard their chastity, i.e. from committing illegal sex as Zina and sodomy and so on are the true successful believers. He also stated that guarding one's chastity does not prevent him from taking pleasures with his wife or his concubine (woman slave) and he is not to be blamed since this is his right according the contract of marriage or possession in case of concubine. But, whoever seeks pleasure in other channels and means, i.e. not in marriage or concubine, he is considered sinful and transgressor who transgresses the Divine Limitations' . Therefore, we state that it is Haram to use "sex dolls" for enjoyment and one has to guard his private parts except from his wife or what he possesses of woman slave. All

(Popularity Rate: 11 ) Is there any difference between sex with real people and a sex doll?

ings, you may get a headache 6YE Dolland say no to your partner, again a doll does not have that feeling you may awake in the morning feeling aroused and touch your partner to engage in sex, a doll will not do this you may decide to sit and have breakfast in a local cafe with a real partner, enjoy trying to get the doll to order that breakfast simply, a doll is a part time substitute for something that could be real, it has no emotions, not physical or mental contact, can you sit and watch tv and share a piz

(Popularity Rate: 82 ) What’s the funniest court case you’ve seen?

om where Beal lived is a cove with a beautiful beach which is about 250 metres long. People go there for nude sunbaking. One of the people was Mr Beal.
At about that time, the Premier of Queensland decided to grab a couple of votes by cracking down on nude sunbaking, so he ordered Queensland’s finest to be let loose. They threw themselves at the job.
As a result, Mr Beal was arrested in his birthday suit and charged with indecent exposure. I knew him vaguely. He phoned me and asked whether is was a criminal offence. I told him it was, so he retained me.
Now, Mr Beal was a civil engineer. Although he was an Australian, he had spent most of his career designing and building freeways and the like in Colorado and Arizona. He was meticulous. So, off he went and surveyed the whole beach from the southern to the northern headland and drew a detailed plan of the locus in quo, showing where he was, where a couple of other people were, and where the police had first appeared around the rocks on the southern headland.
Mr Beal was about 100 metres north of the rocks.
One other thing. Mr Beal had a copious head of black hair and over-sized sideburns. The lower end of each sideburn was gray - maybe one or two centimetres (1/2 to 1 inch for the Americans).
We turned up in court. There were two police witnesses. Their witness statements were a joke - one was a cut and paste of the other with the names and pronouns changed appropriately to protect the guilty. As you will see, the statements were also stupid.
The young cop testified that when he and the old cop came around the rocks, he had seen Mr Beal stark bollicking naked, standing on the beach.
So I cross-examine him.
Me: You said you identified my client from the rocks.
Cop: Yes.
Me (Almost certain what he was going to say): You couldn’t identify him from there, could you?
Cop: Of course I could. My eyesight is excellent.
Me: OK. describe to the court the man you saw.
Cop (I knew he would): He was tall with black hair and grey sideburns. There he is sitting beside you.
Me (Got the lying bastard): Could you see his genitals.
Cop: Of course.
Me: Tell the court, was he circumcised or not?
The Magistrate nearly fell off the bench laughing.
Mr Beal was acquitted on a point of law - there has to be something sexual associated with public nudity to make it indecent behaviour.
Most trials are a tragedy, one way or another, but even tragedies have amusing moments.
I remember another trial that I reported back in 1996 as part of my entry requirements for the Bar. The judgment is on the web at www.queenslandjudgments.com,au. The case was Donely and Donely v Donely and Others.
For present purposes, what happened was that Justin Donely owned some farming land, but he was holding it on trust under his father-in-law’s will for the benefit of his two small sons, called at the trial “the boys.” Justin wanted to buy some more land and equipment for himself, but he didn’t have the necessary cash, nor any available collateral.
Nothing like that ever stopped a crook. Justin went to the local branch of the National Australia Bank, borrowed the money and gave the bank security for the loan in the form of a mortgage over the boys’ land. The crucial point for this story is that the bank manager knew that Justin was holding the land in trust for his infant sons, but took the mortgage anyway.
Needless to say, it all blew up and the bank sold the boys’ land.
Years passed and the boys turned 21, which, in those days, meant they could sue in their own names. They were majorly pinged off at Justin, so they did.
They retained solicitors who took the job on a speculative basis - no win, no fee - and those solicitors retained my good friend Tony Morris QC to appear on the same basis.
During the trial, Tony was cross-examining the bank’s regional manager about its lending practices. He had contrived to get the banker excessively defensive. The guy was trying to work out which questions were trick questions and which weren’t - which is an excessively stupid thing to do.
Anyway, Tony put it to this turkey that, of course, the bank loaned money to farmers so it could earn interest.
Blow me down if the banker didn’t answer with a straight face, “No. The bank doesn’t care about interest. It’s more concerned with helping the farmers.”
Paul de Jersey, the judge, couldn’t keep a straight face and I nearly wet Asian Sex Dollmyself laughing. The bank settled that afternoon.
But wait! There’s more.
Justice de Jersey’s daughter was his Associate. At the risk of drawing having sex with a doll the ire of those pofaces in the #metoo movement, I can say that she was exceptionally beautiful.
One of the boys thought so because the next morning after the bank blew itself up, the judge announced that one of them had called his chambers to ask if he could take his daughter to dinner. The judge was concerned that maybe he should recuse himself because he might be said to be biased.
Everyone thought it was a great joke, but nothing more, so the trial continued and the boys won.
Sorry about the long answer, but I


Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6Page 7Page 8Page 9Page 10

Page 11Page 12Page 13Page 14Page 15Page 16Page 17Page 18Page 19Page 20